Does ‘the Last Hour’ in 1 John 2:18 Support an Imminent Rapture? – Ep. 112

Pretribs think that “the last hour” in 1 John 2:18 implies an imminent rapture. I gave three reasons why it does not.

“Children, it is the last hour, and just as you heard that the antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have appeared. We know from this that it is the last hour.” (1 John 2:18)

In the immediate context, John is teaching his readers not to “love the world” by desiring its fleshy attachments (1 John 2:15–17). The state of the world prompts John to claim that it is the “last hour,” including the deceptive teaching that “denies that Jesus is the Messiah” (v. 22). This teaching crept in among the believers who John is writing to: “I have not written to you that you do not know the truth, but that you do know it, and that no lie is of the truth….These things I have written to you about those who are trying to deceive you” (1 John 2:21, 26).

Pretrib interpreters have claimed that 1 John 2:18 supports imminence. This is mistaken. It is another example, of many, that we have seen where pretrib interpreters read imminence into the biblical text. We are told that John’s statement “it is the last hour” means that the next event on the prophetic calendar is the rapture of the church. How exactly they come to this conclusion from the text itself is not possible. They do, however, come to this conclusion based on flawed presuppositions.

They assume that “last hour” excludes the period when the Antichrist arrives. This is fallacious for three reasons. First, nowhere in this passage, nor anywhere in the Bible, does the expression “last hour” indicate that the coming Antichrist is excluded. The pretrib interpreter must assume this.

Second, for the sake of the argument let’s assume this is true, that it does mean the period before the Antichrist. A salient problem remains for them—it does not follow that the rapture will happen before the Antichrist. They have to assume this as well to maintain imminence, injecting the notion that the rapture happens before the Antichrist arrives. This assumption is found in the mind of the pretrib interpreter, but not found in the biblical text.

Third, it is ironic that they cite this verse as supporting imminence, since it indicates the opposite. John states that his readers have already witnessed many antichrists: “so now many antichrists have appeared…they went out from us, but they did not really belong to us.” John defines “antichrist” as “the person who denies the Father and the Son” (v. 22). In the same breath, John has indicated that his readers should expect to see the future Antichrist: “that the antichrist is coming.” There is no exegetical basis to affirm that the church witnesses the former, but will not witness the latter. John never suggests that the church will witness past and present antichrists, but they will not witness the future Antichrist. This inconsistency by the pretrib interpreter is unwarranted. And John does not suggest at all to his readers that they should expect to be raptured before the coming Antichrist. John simply notes the coming of the Antichrist as matter-of-fact. It would make John’s teaching unintelligible and irrelevant for his readers to read it otherwise.

In conclusion, by applying the pretrib’s own definition of imminence to 1 John 2:19—no prophesied events will intervene before the rapture of the church—this proof text does not pass muster as support for imminence.


Paper Notice: East Region Meeting ETS in Lancaster, PA, April 7–8

I will be delivering a paper at the 2018 Evangelical Theological Society East Region Meeting in Lancaster, PA, April 7–8. Here is the title and abstract of the paper: The Theological Word-Concept Fallacy: James Barr's Linguistic Critique Then and … [Continue reading]

Paul’s Use of Isaiah 59:20-21 in Romans 11:26-27

by Michael Vlach One example where a New Testament writer views an Old Testament prophetic passage as needing to be fulfilled literally in the future is Paul’s use of Isaiah 59:20-21 in Romans 11:26-27: and so all Israel will be saved; just as it … [Continue reading]

The Structure of Matthew’s Olivet Discourse – Ep. 111

The key issue to the structure of Matthew's Olivet Discourse is the relationship between vv. 9–14 and verse 15ff. I first talked about the disciples' questions about the sign to the parousia (second coming) and the end of the age, which opens up the … [Continue reading]

Is Saudi Arabia’s City NEOM Mystery Babylon?

 "David Rosenthal, Director of Operations at Zion's Hope, shares about what is taking place in the Middle East, particularly Saudi Arabia, and the creation of a new metropolis on the Red Sea, and the potential implications for … [Continue reading]

Is Rome Mystery Babylon?

   … [Continue reading]

‘Apocalypse’ ‘Apocalyptic’ ‘Apocalypticism’

Apocalypse. A text that purports to offer disclosure of heavenly secrets by vision, dream or audition. Apocalyptic. An adjective referring to that which is linked with revelation or the Apocalypse, the book of Revelation, often used as an … [Continue reading]

Pray for Dr. Tommy Ice’s Health

Update:  Continue to pray for Dr. Ice as he recovers. Please pray for Dr. Tommy Ice who had a major heart attack yesterday. He will have open heart surgery this next Wednesday.  Dr. Ice is the executive director of the Pre-Trib Research … [Continue reading]

A Brief Reply to Mike Stallard of Israel My Glory… I want to comment on this recent article by Dr. Mike Stallard who is the Director of International Ministries for The Friends of Israel Gospel Ministry. This article above is from the recent … [Continue reading]

Reply to Thomas Kidd: “When Christians Began Speaking of ‘the’ Antichrist”

Since the comment section of Thomas Kidd's blog does not work, I will post my comments to his blog article here (his blog article is linked below).     Thomas, Thank you for your article. If I may, I would like to point out a … [Continue reading]

The Fifth Seal and ‘The Pretrib Contradiction’ – Ep. 110

The Pretrib Contradiction exposes the weakness of pretribulation rapture theology. I explained two aspects to this contradiction. First, I talked about how the fifth seal relates (or does not relate) to Paul's promise in 1 Thess 5:9 about believers … [Continue reading]