Skip to content
  • Support Us
  • Podcast Archive
  • Blog
  • Store
  • About
    • Bio
    • Statment of Faith
    • Contact
  • My Account
  • 0 items
  • Support Us
  • Podcast Archive
  • Blog
  • Store
  • About
    • Bio
    • Statment of Faith
    • Contact
  • My Account
  • 0 items
  • Subscribe by Email
  • X
  • Email
  • Spotify
  • RSS
  • Podcast RSS
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Venmo
  • Podfriend

Category: Rebuttals

Categories

Part 1 – Response to Preterist Gary DeMar

•
November 8, 2012

Gary DeMar, who is a preterist advocate from the American Vision worldview ministry, posted today this surface-level critique of the prewrath position. Actually, it was not so much a critique of the prewrath …

A Response to Greg Laurie on the Rapture

•
October 27, 2012

Greg Laurie asserts: Where are we today in relation to all of this? God has been pouring out his Spirit on the church, but that time is coming to an end. And it …

Part 6 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 13, 2012

This is the last installment of our six-part series. The last reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is found in a helpful parallel passage …

Part 5 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 12, 2012

The fourth reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is found in the use of the term parousia. The term is used only four times …

Perry Stone: “50,000 Hours of Bible Study” Failing to Prove the Post-trib View

•
October 11, 2012

Perry Stone in this video asserts, “After 50,000 hours of Bible study I have done everything I can to try to prove there will be a post-trib coming and I can't prove it.” …

Part 4 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 11, 2012

The third reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is recognizing Jesus’ audience. Hart argues verses 4–35 are intended for a Jewish audience and verses …

A Debate Challenge for Perry Stone

•
October 10, 2012

In this video, Perry Stone defending pretribulationism gives a convoluted argument trying to show that Matthew 24:31 is not speaking of the rapture but instead depicts the gathering of the Jews. His argument …

Part 3 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 10, 2012

The second reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is found in the natural antecedent. Verse 36 reads, “But as for that day and hour …

Part 2 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 9, 2012

As mentioned in the first part, Hart views these two passages as incompatible because he construes verses 4­–35 teaching signs before Christ’s coming, while verses 36–44 teaching no signs before his coming. Therefore, …

Part 1 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 8, 2012

Pretribs have three big proof texts: James 5:7–9, Titus 2:11–14, and Matthew 24:36. It is the latter proof text that I will split up in a six part series. This first part is …

Bible-Centered Conference Contrasted with America-Centered Conference

•
September 30, 2012

This is a teachable moment. An hour ago, I posted about Jan Markell's upcoming prophecy conference. I was curious to see what prophecy subjects and biblical texts the speakers were going to be …

« Previous 1 … 5

The Word of God, Old and New Testament is inspired and inerrant, eternal, living and active.

The kingdom of God will be manifested in a future, physical earth where Jesus will rule as king over the nations.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter
2026 © by Bible Prophecy Answers, Inc All Rights Reserved