Skip to content
  • Support Us
  • Podcast Archive
  • Blog
  • Store
  • About
    • Bio
    • Statment of Faith
    • Contact
  • My Account
  • 0 items
  • Support Us
  • Podcast Archive
  • Blog
  • Store
  • About
    • Bio
    • Statment of Faith
    • Contact
  • My Account
  • 0 items
  • Subscribe by Email
  • X
  • Email
  • Spotify
  • RSS
  • Podcast RSS
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Venmo
  • Podfriend

Tag: John F. Hart

Categories

Does Matthew 24:36–44 Refer to the Pretribulation Rapture?

•
June 21, 2019

Six years ago, I did a six-part series responding to John F. Hart's (and other pretrib teachers') unfounded and strained interpretation that the parousia in Matt 24:36–44 is a completely different parousia than …

A Response to John Hart’s Flawed Comparison between Jesus and Paul’s Use of the ‘Birth Pangs’ Metaphor

•
June 11, 2019

[*There will be no episode of The Biblical Prophecy Program today since I have a respiratory virus and talking causes coughing fits. But in lieu of the program I wanted to write up …

Irenaeus Taught that the Church Would Face the Antichrist

•
May 30, 2019

Source I want to respond to pretribber John Hart's misrepresentation of Irenaeus, taking a snippet of Irenaeus out of context and making it sound like he is teaching a pretrib rapture. Nothing could …

A Reply to John F. Hart on Why the Parousia in Matt 24:36–44 Refers Back to the Parousia in Matt 24:30–31

•
January 1, 2019

Six years ago, I did a six-part series responding to John F. Hart's (and other pretrib teachers') unfounded and strained interpretation that the parousia in Matt 24:36–44 is a completely different parousia than …

Part 6 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 13, 2012

This is the last installment of our six-part series. The last reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is found in a helpful parallel passage …

Part 5 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 12, 2012

The fourth reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is found in the use of the term parousia. The term is used only four times …

Part 4 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 11, 2012

The third reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is recognizing Jesus’ audience. Hart argues verses 4–35 are intended for a Jewish audience and verses …

Part 3 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 10, 2012

The second reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is found in the natural antecedent. Verse 36 reads, “But as for that day and hour …

Part 2 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 9, 2012

As mentioned in the first part, Hart views these two passages as incompatible because he construes verses 4­–35 teaching signs before Christ’s coming, while verses 36–44 teaching no signs before his coming. Therefore, …

Part 1 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 8, 2012

Pretribs have three big proof texts: James 5:7–9, Titus 2:11–14, and Matthew 24:36. It is the latter proof text that I will split up in a six part series. This first part is …

The Word of God, Old and New Testament is inspired and inerrant, eternal, living and active.

The kingdom of God will be manifested in a future, physical earth where Jesus will rule as king over the nations.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter
2026 © by Bible Prophecy Answers, Inc All Rights Reserved