Skip to content
  • Support Us
  • Podcast Archive
  • Blog
  • Store
  • About
    • Bio
    • Statment of Faith
    • Contact
  • My Account
  • 0 items
  • Support Us
  • Podcast Archive
  • Blog
  • Store
  • About
    • Bio
    • Statment of Faith
    • Contact
  • My Account
  • 0 items
  • Subscribe by Email
  • X
  • Email
  • Spotify
  • RSS
  • Podcast RSS
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Venmo
  • Podfriend

Tag: Olivet Discourse

Categories

Interpretation of the Beginning of Birth Pangs in Matthew 24

•
November 17, 2012

I am encouraged that Joel Richardson is a futurist (he is a posttribulationist), but he is making some critical categorical errors in his interpretation of Matthew 24. Richardson interprets the event of the …

Interviewed on Whether Matthew 24 Applies to the Church

•
October 25, 2012

Today, Chris White interviewed me on the subject of the applicability of Matthew 24. Does it apply to the Church or does it apply to “Jewish believers during the tribulation period” as pretribulationists …

Part 6 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 13, 2012

This is the last installment of our six-part series. The last reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is found in a helpful parallel passage …

Part 5 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 12, 2012

The fourth reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is found in the use of the term parousia. The term is used only four times …

Part 4 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 11, 2012

The third reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is recognizing Jesus’ audience. Hart argues verses 4–35 are intended for a Jewish audience and verses …

Part 3 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 10, 2012

The second reason why verses 36–44 refer to the immediate context of the coming in verses 30–31 is found in the natural antecedent. Verse 36 reads, “But as for that day and hour …

Part 2 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 9, 2012

As mentioned in the first part, Hart views these two passages as incompatible because he construes verses 4­–35 teaching signs before Christ’s coming, while verses 36–44 teaching no signs before his coming. Therefore, …

Part 1 – Why the “Coming” in Matthew 24:36–44 Refers Back to Verses 30–31

•
October 8, 2012

Pretribs have three big proof texts: James 5:7–9, Titus 2:11–14, and Matthew 24:36. It is the latter proof text that I will split up in a six part series. This first part is …

A Futurist Interpretation of Luke 21:20–24

•
September 25, 2012

(20)  “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation has come near. (21) Then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains. Those who are inside …

Another Striking Parallel Between Jesus and Paul Documented

•
May 25, 2012

I have documented over 25 parallels between Jesus and Paul's eschatological teaching, demonstrating clearly that Paul is dependent on Jesus' Olivet Discourse, contra preterism and pretribulationism. Up to this point, I have overlooked another …

New Prewrath Pamphlet Available! Jesus and Paul Teach the Same Second Coming

•
May 14, 2012

Click here and scroll down to purchase it. This pamphlet is ideal for a bible study on the parallels between Jesus and Paul's teaching on the second coming. In addition, the vast majority …

« Previous 1 … 5

The Word of God, Old and New Testament is inspired and inerrant, eternal, living and active.

The kingdom of God will be manifested in a future, physical earth where Jesus will rule as king over the nations.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter
2026 © by Bible Prophecy Answers, Inc All Rights Reserved