The final interview is posted, which is the pretribulational position. I have linked all three interviews below. Next week, there will be a final post where each of the participants were able to ask each other a question.
In the near future, I will be responding to Svigel’s answers. His argument depends much on his allegorizing the “male child” in Revelation 12:5 to be the church, including his lexical fallacies on the word harpazo to support his conclusion (he committed at least three lexical fallacies). This type of errant interpretation is similar to the allegorizing where some pretribs make John in Revelation 4:1 represent the church. It really is telling how pretribulaltionists have to strain Scripture to come up with a pretrib rapture.
Read all three and decide who made the better biblical case for their position!