After ten years of demonstrating the pretrib interpretation that the term “apostasy” in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 does not refer to the rapture, I have had zero pretrib responses to my exegesis. This is very telling, but demonstrates that there is zero evidence for their interpretation.
It is a desperate attempt, with all due respect, to get around the plain meaning of Paul’s message: that the church will face the Antichrist before the day of the Lord begins.
Dr. Andy Woods even wrote an entire book on this and yet he is (1) unwilling to defend his book in a public moderated debate with a prewrath exponent such as myself, and (2) he has never interacted with my specific argumentation.
I am amazed that many pretribulation teachers continue to white-knuckle believe that the Greek noun apostasia in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 refers to the rapture because they claim this Greek noun can mean “physical departure.”
The problem is that the noun never means “physical departure” during the Koine Greek period. It means a religious or political departure.
That should end the debate.
But man’s tradition is strong, in this case, pretribulationism. It is like believing in the Assumption of Mary with no evidence. I mention the Assumption of Mary, because pretribulationists desperately appeal to this NT apocryphal work as “evidence” that apostasia can mean “physical departure.”
There is only one problem: the document is dated at the end of the 5th century A.D! In other words, this usage here is not during the time of Jesus, let alone during the larger Koine period.
It seems no amount of evidence will convince them that they are wrong.
If you think I am exaggerating, take this example:
In my cross-examination period in my public debate with Thomas Ice a few years back in Texas, I challenged him on this very point and he had to admit that he could not name a single document during the Koine Greek period where the noun apostasia means a “physical departure.” But he continues to this very day believing that it does.
The following is a catalogue of articles that I have written over the years for this website on this topic.
Does Apostasia in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 Refer to a ‘Physical Departure’ (i.e. the Rapture)?
Did Jerome in the Latin Vulgate Understand Discessio in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 as ‘Defection’ or ‘Physical Departure’?
How Did the Syriac Version Translate the Greek ‘Apostasia’ in 2 Thess 2:3?
Do NOT Read Back 16th Century English Translations into Apostasia in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 to Mean a Physical Departure! – Ep. 87
(VIDEO) Audience Member Stumps Thomas Ice with Question at a Debate | Midwest Prophecy Conference, Calvary Chapel, Lafayette, IN
My Cross-Examination Period with Thomas Ice in the Prewrath vs Pretrib Debate
A Response to Pastor J. D. Farag’s Misinformation on 2 Thess 2:3 Claiming that ‘Apostasia’ Refers to the Rapture (Video)
Reply to H. Wayne House on the Claim that APOSTASIA Can Mean ‘Spatial Departure’
A Brief Reply to Arnold Fruchtenbaum on the Meaning of the Greek Noun Apostasia
A public debate challenge for Andy Woods to defend his new book: The Falling Away: Spiritual Departure or Physical Rapture?: A Second Look at 2 Thessalonians 2:3
A Reply to Andy Woods on ‘APOSTASIA Is the Rapture’ – Ep. 104